They say that the best things in life are worth
waiting for, and as far as the British Library goes, they certainly are.
I have over the last couple of years mentioned the project to digitise part
of the newspaper collection of the BL, and at last a start has been made.
And what an amazing start it is. There are 48 titles now fully searchable,
from all over the United Kingdom. They come from Aberdeen to Exeter, with
Manchester, Newcastle, Oxford, Belfast and Derby, and many other points in
between. Some London titles are included, but these are not all simply daily
or weekly papers. We have ‘The Era’, the paper from the world of entertainment,
some Chartist titles and the ‘Illustrated Police News’, so there is something
here for almost anyone.
Most of this collection has been digitised for the complete 19th century,
with a few back into the 1700s but some starting well after 1800. A search
can be narrowed down to a region or a specific title, so there is plenty
of scope.
But in addition to this collection of 19th century newspapers, the Library’s
Burney collection of 17th and 18th century papers has also been digitised.
This is a group of over 1,200 titles and they can be searched with the 19th
century index, or on their own. I have tried a few searches and the Burney
collection adds a significant percentage to the number of hits, so it is
clearly a major help to research.
The only trouble for you people in Australia is that the newspapers can only
be searched on the computers within the British Library. It might be that
one day the BL will licence others to access the collection off-site but
meanwhile for us over here it is going to be very useful indeed. And mind
you, this is only the beginning. The current BL action plan includes a proposal
to put half as many newspapers again online by the end of 2009. With the
long-term plan to close down the Newspaper Library, as well as to secure
the preservation of the newspaper collection, we family historians can only
welcome the digitisation of these files.
Elsewhere we are seeing the running down of the Family Records Centre. The
number of visitors seems to be decreasing all the time. I should think that
most people will not want to do lengthy searches of the birth, marriages
and death indexes by fiche and are already getting used to using the online
versions. But at Kew they are getting ready to welcome more visitors once
the FRC closes and much building work is taking place.
All certificates are now ordered by post or online, and there is no London
collection point. Certificates can be collected from the General Register
Office at Southport, but while that will be a help to the relatively few
people who live up there, it is of limited use to anyone else. I should
think about as useful as your Melbourne registry closing down the Collins
Street office and reopening with a collection facility in Mildura.
But more and more material is coming to us down the telephone line to our
computers. The National Archives continues to expand their online catalogue
with detailed listings of the contents. There are now references from the
indexes to divorces, class J78. The indexes commence in 1858 with the formation
of the Court for Divorce and Matrimonial Causes, and name both parties with
the name of the co-respondent, if any. The online index picks up all the
names mentioned, so now we can discover if an ancestor was named in a divorce
court! This might not be the sort of family history some people are looking
for, but it will surely add colour to any tale. The full divorce files to
1938 are at Kew, the index providing the reference.
The nonconformist registers are also now available to search online, at BMDregisters.
The records are held at The National Archives and most appear on the IGI.
But the registers of The Protestant Dissenters’ Registry at Dr. Williams’s
Library, founded 1742, and The Wesleyan Methodist Metropolitan Registry,
from 1818, rarely come up on the IGI but have been included in the index
compiled by S & N Genealogy in co-operation with TNA. So this new venture
will bring up many baptisms which until now have been on the ‘missing presumed
lost forever’ list.
In the future the records of the Quakers and of Britons abroad will be included
in this index. These are another two groups of records which will doubtless
hold many surprises for genealogists who had never thought to look in these
places. The Quaker records in particular are fascinating. Their marriage
entries often name the parents of the bride and groom, including places of
residence of all of these people, and can come with long lists of witnesses
to the event, many of whom will be related to the couple.
On the printed word front there has been a major contribution by Anthony
Camp. For many years he has been researching the illegitimate offspring
of the Royal family and he has now published ‘Royal Mistresses and Bastards,
Fact and Fiction 1714-1936’. He has conducted exhaustive research and put
together a very detailed account of the likely and not so likely connections
to the Royal family. There are Australian connections too, so some local
families might be interested to see how they appear in print. There is no
shortage of families who have a rumoured link to the Royal family and now
they have an authoritative source to check. The rest of us can just enjoy
dipping into this vast lake of facts about people who might appear in the
course of our research, or about whom we are simply curious.
So as 2008 gets into its stride, we are blessed with some useful aids to
our research. I will have to make a determined effort to use those newspapers
at the British Library, for I am sure they are going to add interest, if
not something actually useful, to my research.
I hope you can all make progress with your research this year.